SQUAWK/NEWS
Account
Theme
Account
Menu
Live News GEOPOLITICS ARTICLE H impact

BULL INVESTOR ALERT: Webull Corporation Investors with Substantial Losses May Seek to Lead Class Action Lawsuit, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces — December 7, 2026 Deadline

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below: BULL INVESTOR ALERT: Webull Corporation Investors with Substantial Losses May Seek to Lead Class Action Lawsuit, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces — December 7, 2026 Deadline The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Webull Corporation (NASDAQ: BULL) publicly traded securities between April 26, 2025 and October 6, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until December 7, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Webull class action lawsuit. Captioned Ward v. Webull Corporation, No. 26-cv-03052 (M.D. Fla.), the Webull class action lawsuit charges Webull as well as certain of Webull’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Webull class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys Ken Dolitsky or Michael Albert of Robbins Geller by calling 800/851-7783 or via e-mail at info@rgrdlaw.com (mailto:info@rgrdlaw.com). CASE ALLEGATIONS: Webull operates as a digital investme

BULL.O

For best results when printing this announcement, please click on link below: BULL INVESTOR ALERT: Webull Corporation Investors with Substantial Losses May Seek to Lead Class Action Lawsuit, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces — December 7, 2026 Deadline The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Webull Corporation (NASDAQ: BULL) publicly traded securities between April 26, 2025 and October 6, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until December 7, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Webull class action lawsuit. Captioned Ward v. Webull Corporation, No. D.

), the Webull class action lawsuit charges Webull as well as certain of Webull’s top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. com). CASE ALLEGATIONS: Webull operates as a digital investment platform. S.

S. S. access materially overstated Webull’s independence from the PRC; and (iv) as a result, defendants’ statements about Webull’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. S.

” The Select Committee also reportedly found that Webull initially told the Select Committee that it had no offices or employees in China, while Webull’s mainland China subsidiary in fact employed approximately 863 employees, or 62% of Webull’s global workforce. On this news, the price of Webull stock fell 19%, according to the Webull class action lawsuit. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Webull publicly traded securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Webull class action lawsuit.

A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Webull class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Webull class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Webull class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation. Our Firm ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report, recovering more than $916 million for investors in 2025. This marks our fourth #1 ranking in the past five years. 4 billion more than any other law firm.

2 billion — in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. com: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Ken Dolitsky Michael Albert 655 W. com)