Gold Is Down 20% from its Iran-War Peak: Which ETF Is Best Positioned for a Rebound?
Gold has fallen more than 20% since the U.S.-Iran conflict began in late February, but a sharp shift in Federal Reserve expectations could give gold-focused ETFs a fresh catalyst. Spot gold was around $4,165 an ounce in Asian trade Wednesday after gaining 0.6% in the previous session. Traders now see less than a 22% chance of an October Fed rate hike, according to CME FedWatch tool, down from roughly 40% a week ago. Falling Treasury yields could further support bullion. Middle East oil flows have recovered to around 80% of pre-conflict levels, easing some inflation concerns. Lower yields also reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold. For investors looking to position for a potential rebound, four ETFs offer distinctly different ways to play the setup. GLD — The Liquidity Play The SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD ) is the largest of the four, with about $142 billion in assets. It physically holds gold and charges a 0.40% expense ratio. Its key advantage is liquidity, making it especially useful for active traders and options investors. IAU — Lower-Cost Core Exposure The iShares Gold Trust (NYSE: IAU ) also holds physical gold but charges 0.25%. With roughly $66 billion in
-Iran conflict began in late February, but a sharp shift in Federal Reserve expectations could give gold-focused ETFs a fresh catalyst. 6% in the previous session. Traders now see less than a 22% chance of an October Fed rate hike, according to CME FedWatch tool, down from roughly 40% a week ago. Falling Treasury yields could further support bullion.
Middle East oil flows have recovered to around 80% of pre-conflict levels, easing some inflation concerns. Lower yields also reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold. For investors looking to position for a potential rebound, four ETFs offer distinctly different ways to play the setup. GLD — The Liquidity Play The SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD ) is the largest of the four, with about $142 billion in assets.
40% expense ratio. Its key advantage is liquidity, making it especially useful for active traders and options investors. 25%. With roughly $66 billion in assets, it offers a balance of scale, liquidity and lower costs than GLD.
10%. With about $31 billion in assets, it is arguably the most cost-efficient option for investors seeking long-term direct gold exposure. GLD represents roughly 10 times as much gold per share as GLDM. GDX — The Higher-Beta Gold Trade The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: GDX ) is different.
51%. Mining companies can potentially deliver greater upside than gold when bullion rises because higher gold prices can expand miners’ profit margins. But GDX also carries equity, operating and cost risks. Which ETF Fits The Rebound?
51% Higher-risk, higher-beta gold play The distinction matters. GLD, IAU and GLDM are essentially bets on bullion, while GDX is a bet on gold miners benefiting from higher bullion prices. If falling yields and fading Fed-hike expectations trigger a sustained gold rebound, GDX could offer more upside — but with considerably more volatility. For investors seeking a purer gold-price recovery, GLDM offers the lowest-cost route, while GLD remains the standout for liquidity and options trading.
Read Also: Retail Market (Still) Mostly Ignores the ‘Hedge Against All Human Stupidity’ Photo: Shutterstock