Judge again declines to order Google breakup after illegal monopoly finding
A federal judge ruled Google operated an illegal monopoly and agreed it rigged how customers buy online ads, but declined to force a breakup. It is the third such decision in the past year.
It is the third time in the last year that a judge has decided against breaking up a big tech company.
Google has once again avoided being broken up, despite a formal finding that it has operated an illegal monopoly.
A federal judge agreed with prosecutors that Google had rigged the way its customers buy online ads but stopped short of forcing the company to sell the business.
It followed a similar finding last year in Google’s giant search business.
It is the third time in the last year that a judge has decided against breaking up a big tech company (Meta also avoided a divestiture of Instagram and WhatsApp).
The pattern has frustrated liberal antitrust thinkers. “Why do judges bother to find companies guilty of running a monopoly if they’re unwilling to break them up?” The American Prospect’s David Dayen wrote.
But it’s been a boon for corporate America, which has skirted meaningful remedial antitrust action for years, even under Democratic presidencies.
The FTC and DOJ have had more success blocking mergers, but judges don’t seem inclined to unwind businesses.