Menu
Live News EQUITY H impact

Cassidy Pushes Social Security Reform

Senator Bill Cassidy plans to push for Social Security reform in his last months in office, proposing a separate investment fund to help fund the program's shortfall

QQQSPY

Republican Sen.

Bill Cassidy of Louisiana plans to make Social Security reform a priority in his last months in office, he tells CNBC.com.

Cassidy, who lost a May primary for reelection, said he will continue to push for his "big idea" fix to help fund Social Security's shortfall by creating a separate fund that would invest in stocks on the program's behalf.

Social Security's trustees now project the trust fund that helps pay retirement benefits may run out in late 2032, when 78% of those benefits would be payable. "The longer you wait, the harder it is to fix, the more painful to fix," Cassidy said. "We need to do something now." Republican Sen.

Bill Cassidy of Louisiana has one big task he would like to check off his to-do list before his last day in office — Social Security reform.

Cassidy, a two-term senator, failed in May to win his primary reelection bid against Rep.

Julia Letlow and state Treasurer John Fleming.

President Donald Trump endorsed Letlow over Cassidy, who was one of seven Republican senators who voted to convict the president during his impeachment trial for allegedly inciting insurrection at the U.S.

Capitol on Jan.

6, 2021.

Now Cassidy, whose term officially ends on Jan.

3, 2027, has vowed to get as much done as he can in his final days in office — including addressing Social Security, sometimes called the third rail of politics because of the potential consequences for leaders in office who enact changes to the program that more than 71 million Americans rely on for monthly Social Security retirement and disability benefits. "The longer you wait, the harder it is to fix, the more painful to fix," Cassidy told CNBC.com on June 10 in an interview outside the Capitol building. "We need to do something now." How to get SpaceX stock — without buying the IPO Social Security trust funds may last longer than expected: Wharton analysis Women have better retirement savings habits but lower 401(k) balances than men Republicans buy crypto more than Democrats, data shows.

What's driving the divide CNBC's Financial Advisor 100: Best financial advisors, top firms ranked CNBC Elite Advisors: Top ultra-high net worth wealth management firms for 2026 Social Security faces an imminent funding shortfall, according to the latest annual report from the program's trustees, released on June 9 .

Absent action from Congress, the trust fund used to pay benefits to retired workers, their spouses, children and survivors of deceased workers — known as Old-Age and Survivors Insurance, or OASI — may run out in the fourth quarter of 2032 , according to the report , several months earlier than had been projected the year before.

If no changes are enacted by that time, the OASI trust fund depletion may trigger across-the-board benefit cuts.

Just 78% of scheduled benefits for that fund would be payable at that time, according to the trustees' latest projections.

Lawmakers may opt to extend the program's funding slightly by combining the retirement and disability trust funds.

Social Security's trustees estimate that this would bring the depletion date to the third quarter of 2034, when 83% of scheduled benefits would be payable.

The new Social Security trustees report has prompted acknowledgment from House and Senate leaders on both sides of the aisle that something needs to be done. "It's clear now that Congress shouldn't delay any longer," four senators — Cassidy; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; Tim Kaine, D-Va.; and Thom Tillis, R-N.C. — said in a joint statement released on June 10. "Several of us have been coming together to talk about how we can strengthen Social Security for current and future generations of retirees," the four senators wrote. "We say to our colleagues: join us in doing what we were elected to do—legislate on hard issues and protect this lifeline program for our kids and grandkids." While time is of the essence for Social Security, it is also a factor for both Durbin and Cassidy.

Durbin, who is currently Senate minority whip, is retiring at the end of his current term. "I'm a retiring, so to speak, senator," Cassidy said. "I want to get it done before we leave, so there is impetus to get it done." Social Security reform will have to be bipartisan, since legislation on the program requires 60 votes in the Senate.

Some Democrats have proposed raising taxes on the wealthy to help shore up Social Security's finances while also increasing benefits.

Meanwhile, Republicans largely oppose tax hikes, which leaves benefit cuts such as raising the retirement age as potential options.

Cassidy has come up with what he calls a "big idea" plan that mostly sidesteps the dilemma of raising taxes or cutting benefits.

Instead, the proposal calls for investing $1.5 trillion in an investment fund separate from Social Security's trust funds over five years.

Over 65 to 70 years, that money that would be invested in the stock market would grow to 60% to 65% of Social Security's unfunded accrued liability, Cassidy said.

While the $1.5 trillion would be borrowed, it wouldn't increase the nation's debt, since it would be held in an escrow account and would therefore stay in the government's possession, according to Cassidy.

The plan is modeled after changes enacted to the federal Railroad Retirement system under President George W.

Bush that allowed the pension funds to be invested in private securities.

Investing on behalf of that program improved its solvency, Cassidy said, and could be a model for Social Security.

Notably, the change was enacted on a bipartisan basis, Cassidy said.

It remains to be seen whether the proposal will win broader political support on Capitol Hill or from the White House. "President Trump and I are not BFFs," Cassidy said of the president, who last month called the senator a " disloyal disaster " on social media.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

To be sure, the idea may also be a tough sell with some Democrats, who have proposals in both the House and Senate t